Register free! 
SC Cases - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 6045   
Title Forum  Year
DCIT vs Radha Govind Build Estate (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 506941]
ITAT (Jaipur) 2016
Padam Lal Dua vs ITO [LexDoc Id : 506940]
ITAT (Delhi) 2016
Nirmala S. Tilavalli vs ITO [LexDoc Id : 506939]
ITAT (Bangalore) 2016
ACIT vs Modern Motors [LexDoc Id : 506938]
ITAT (Jaipur) 2016
ITO vs Mehulbhai D Zhaveri [LexDoc Id : 506937]
ITAT (Ahmedabad) 2016
Vive Sudhakar vs DCIT [LexDoc Id : 506851]
ITAT (Chennai) 2016
Vinod Khimji Dedhia vs ITO [LexDoc Id : 506849]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2016
Principal CIT vs Sanjay Hiralal Thakkar [LexDoc Id : 507305]
HC (Gujarat) 2016
Mewar Polytex Ltd. vs ACIT Dividend-Section 10(34), Section 115-O & Section 2(22) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Exemption.-Whether, impugned order passed by ITAT is liable to be set aside in view of provisions of section 10(34) read with section 115-O of Act since income b [LexDoc Id : 507249]
HC (Rajasthan) 2016
Korp Resources (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs DCIT and Ors. Validity of Notice-Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Re-opening of assessment.-Whether or not reasons recorded by AO for issuing notices under Section 148 are valid and good reasons is entirely factual issue. Held, it would have [LexDoc Id : 507247]
HC (Calcutta) 2016
Rx Infotech (P) Ltd. vs Gopinath T. and Ors. Permanent injunction-Deceptive similarity-Plaintiff sought decree of permanent injunction restraining defendants from directly or indirectly doing business in any goods and services under trad [LexDoc Id : 507150]
HC (Delhi) 2016
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. vs Pr. CIT [LexDoc Id : 506992]
ITAT (Ahmedabad) 2016
Deepak Dalela vs ITO [LexDoc Id : 506931]
ITAT (Jaipur) 2016
ITO vs Ananthi Rabindran [LexDoc Id : 506927]
ITAT (Chennai) 2016
Sagun Foundry (P) Ltd. vs CIT Override clause-Section 43-B of the Income Tax Act, 1962. Provident fund.-Whether, second proviso to Section 43-B of Act does not override first proviso to said section and hence deduction of certain amount in respect of emp [LexDoc Id : 507304]
HC (Allahabad) 2016
CIT vs DLF Universal Ltd. Detected property from accounts-Section 145(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Distortions.-Whether, ITAT was correct in law in setting aside CIT(A) order wherein it was held that method of accounting followed by assessee in past and accepted [LexDoc Id : 507242]
HC (Delhi) 2016
Pepsico Inc. and Ors. vs Sagarnil Enterprise and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 507146]
HC (Delhi) 2016
Tegh Cables (P) Ltd. vs ACIT

ACIT vs Tegh Cables (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 507044]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2016
DCIT vs Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd.

Sardar Sarovar Narmada Nigam Ltd. vs JCIT
[LexDoc Id : 507043]
ITAT (Ahmedabad) 2016
DSP Merill Lynch Capital Ltd. vs ACIT

DCIT vs DSP Merill Lynch Capital Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 507030]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2016
Dalwala Securities Ltd. vs DCIT

Mukul Holding and Trading Co. (P) Ltd. vs ACIT
[LexDoc Id : 507028]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2016
ITO vs Bhagat Industrial [LexDoc Id : 507027]
ITAT (Amritsar) 2016
ITO vs Ramesh L. Gajra [LexDoc Id : 506982]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2016
ITO vs R.C. Sampat [LexDoc Id : 506981]
ITAT (Mumbai) 2016
Nitin Enterprises vs ITO [LexDoc Id : 506978]
ITAT (Amritsar) 2016
 
First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last